Gay Marriage Outline Essay

In earliest times, same-sex espousals was non considered taboo and in more cultures, it was encou madnessd. haphazard History (2011) explains that in the weeish urbaneizedizations of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt, the matrimony between pits of the same-sex was know by the kingdom. During Greeks early years, attraction between a universe and a nonher man was normal and was considered an style of rage. The main considerations in same-sex human relationships in early taradiddle were often fill in, beauty, and excellence of consultation rather than gender (Random History, 2011, p.1). Same-sex labor unions were often supposed to be more pure than a straight person spousals. Marriage was believed to be the union of twain the great unwashed establish on love. A mating consisting of devil males or devil females, if women had the compensate to get married, was non fr witnessed upon. It was non until the rise of Christianity that a negative spot towards same-se x conglutination became introduced. The depression that marriage was found on pro institution and whatsoever relationship that was non-procreative began to increase in m each societies. Random Historys 2011 studyk describes how east religions varied in their views about human world marriages.Japanese Buddhism records the around tolerant spot toward tribadisticity, praising it for its mystery. Today, there ar no religious or political limitations on homosexual behavior in Japan. sexual practice is considered a private matter and lacks any(prenominal) obstructions. The sacred texts in the Hindu tradition, the Vedas, did non restrict homosexuality, but rather viewed it as perverse (Random History, 2011, p.1). Other things, such as mixed race relationships were considered more nauseated than homosexuality. Random History (2011) as substantially explains how in the thirteenth century, the first laws banning sodomy were introduced and were strictly en lunged. Throug h the next centuries, homosexual behavior became deviant and was punished. Due to the touch that homosexual behavior was wrong, the belief that straight person relationships were normal became popular among the majority of countries. By the nineteenth century, heterosexuality became the closely believed stock for relationships.Although the deal for same-sex marriage became noticeably familiar in the late twentieth century, it was not until 1993 during a Hawaiian case, that the issue became depicted object youngs. The ruling of the case groundd that the restriction of marriage and its benefits toopposite-sex couples were unconstitutional. The Defense of Marriage Act, which was introduced in 1996, was almost a direct retort to the Hawaiian case, decl ard that no state would be required to recognize a same-sex marriage from an separate state, and also delimit marriage as a union between champion man and maven woman (Axel-Lute, 2002, p.1). By that same year, a majority of states passed laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. Since then, states consume defined their own definition of marriage. Despite the fact that the debate over same-sex marriage is relatively new in the United States, five states halt made same-sex marriage good, as healthy as Washington D.C.According to the Floridas Domestic Partnership (2010), currently, there atomic number 18 only two states that recognize same-sex marriages, naked as a jaybird York and California. In California, the marriage is only acknowledge if it was before proposition 8. Ballot Pedias 2008 research explains how proposition 8 is a comprehensive ballot proposition in California. The citizenry of California voted for the illegalization of same-sex marriage. Though some nation are against same-sex marriages for religious reasonablenesss, not allo give way headwayg same-sex marriages is discrimination. Same-sex marriages should be legalized because the discrimination same-sex couples receive is emoti onally traumatic, and unfair. The most influential reason against same-sex marriage is based on religion. more passel believe that replication is the beau ideal reason for marriage. Their belief is that same-sex couples do not drive the mental ability to nominate squirtren which is the basis for marriage. However, when two of the most influential religious icons discussed marriage, child object was not a reason for two peck to get married.It is highly significant that Jesus and Paul, while both referring to the creation story, never once mention procreation or physical sexual end in their teaching about marriage (Sullivan, 1997, p.79). Both men stressed how the timber of a relationship was the most essential aspect for marriage. If marriage is reserved for having a child, then same-sex marriages are not an issue. at that place are countless ways to have a child. Not all of them meat to doing the same thing (Meilander, 1996). Many same-sex couples utilization artific ial insemination to conceive a child. Liz Tracys 2011 article interviews Maria and Vivian, a lesbian couple who were married in advanced York last year. The two have a 21 year old girl by artificial insemination. During a marriage ceremony, the churchs only elaboration is togive its blessing. The church does not, in fact, get married anyone.People marry each other. The state, not the church, defines the nature of legal marriage (Sullivan, 1997, p.68). Sullivan (1997) also states how the church has blessed fields when crops have been planted, MX missiles, new houses, and warships whose sole shoot for is to kill and destroy. There is no reason the church should not bless a relationship in which two people vow to be faithful and love each other for all eternity. Supporters of same-sex marriage believe the bill to allow same-sex marriage should be crafted in a particular way that depart help win votes from people of faith. The measure would not force religious organizations to gr ant marriages to same-sex couples, a blend in that would make the government benefits of marriage jibe for gay and straight couples but solace allow the sacrament of marriage to be defined by churches (Groeninger, 2012, p.2).If the bill was scripted and carried out in a indisputable way, the church would not have any association with same-sex couples getting married because the surgical procedure would be carried out in a courtroom. The American gay rights movement, which became heated in the 1970s, defined marriage as oppressive, sexist, and a heterosexual institution, according to the subject geological formation of Womens 2012 studies. By the government prohibiting same-sex couples from getting married, they are denying them rights that every other American has. Marriage is a unique legal status conferred by and recognized by governments all over the world. It brings with it a drove of reciprocal obligations, rights and security measures (National Organization of Women, 2012, p, 1). There are numerous rights and responsibilities that are associated with marriage. Same-sex couples are being discriminated against because they are not allowed any of these rights.The National Organization of Womens 2012 research elaborate many of the 1,138 federal rights, protections and responsibilities that come along with marriage, which same-sex couples are denied. Social Security benefits upon death, damage or retirement of spouse, as well as benefits for minor children, workers compensation protections for the family of a worker injured on the job, exemptions from nation taxes when a spouse dies, exemptions from federal income taxes on spouses health amends are all denied to same-sex couples. The discrimination and self-discipline of marriage and its benefits of same-sex couples can be emotionally traumatic at times. Because literally hundredsof important legal, economic, practical, and social benefits and protections flow directly from marriage, the pro jection from this central social institution wreaks received harm on real support same-sex couples everyday (Sullivan, 1997, p. 129). Same-sex couples are denied the right to make decisions regarding their partners health or medical treatment. Sullivan (1997) also explains how same-sex couples are not allowed to adopt their partners children or how lesbian mothers are often denied handcuffs of their children.One of the most common arguments against same-sex marriage is societys image of the ideal family. The public acceptance of homosexuality subverts the perceptual constancy and self-understanding of the heterosexual family (Sullivan, 1997, p.146). Conservatives believe that the ideal family includes one father and one mother. Both of the parents mildew their children in a certain way. Many believe that a same-sex couple cannot create a child properly because the child is not raised with both paternal and motherly qualities. However, Sullivan (2012) also discusses how even t hough some parents may be bilk that their child will not produce a grandchild, they would still prefer to see their child find someone to love and live with and share his or her brio with. If a child is surrounded by two parents who love them, they will wear and grow as any other child would.Many states have legalized culturedised unions since 2000. Although civilian unions provide legal protection to same-sex couples, they are only recognized at the state level. Many believe legalizing same-sex marriage is not an urgent issue because civil unions are becoming legal in more states. Giving same-sex couples the right to squall a loved one in the hospital, make end of life decisions and get property through civil unions was considered the spunk ground (Groeninger, 2012, p.1). There is a Brobdingnagian amount of differences in a marriage and civil union. Debatepedias 2011 research explains how civil unions are separate and unequal because people in a heterosexual relationship have nettle to civil unions, to date same-sex couples do not have access to marriage. Civil unions are unequal because they are not recognized state to state. A same-sex couple in a civil union is denied the all of the rights that come with marriage. Also, civil unions do not receive any federal benefit.Because the federal government does not respect civil unions, a couple with a civil union will be in a mannequin of limbo with regard to governmental functionsperformed by both state and federal governments, such as taxation, pension protections, provision of insurance policy for families, and means-tested programs like Medicaid (National Organization of Women, 2012, p.1). The debate over same-sex marriage will forever rage until it becomes legalized. Same-sex relationships have been a part of history since the ancient times. Not allowing same-sex marriage is discrimination. Couples are denied financial benefits heterosexual couples receive. Same-sex marriage should be legalized so couples will have the right to make decisions regarding their partners health and medical treatment as well as allowing them to adopt one another(prenominal)s children. Designing the bill a certain way will enable to church to stay uninvolved, since religious reasons are the most common reason for people being against same-sex marriage. Legalizing same-sex marriages will create equating for all people in a relationship and defeat the injustice among same-sex couples.